Path: rQ!rQdQ!remarQ73!supernews.com!remarQ.com!worldfeed.news.gte.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news1.carrier1.net!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newshub.bart.net!news.bart.net!news.bart.net!not-for-mail
From: Per Magnusson <anonymous@nym.cypherpunks.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology,alt.scientology
Subject: Miscellaneous part 1
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:40:36 -0500
Organization: bART Internet Services
Lines: 1197
Message-ID: <36E443D4.FFE72925@nym.cypherpunks.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mickey.2005.bart.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: freyja.bart.nl 920907349 19922 194.158.161.8 (8 Mar 1999 15:35:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bart.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 1999 15:35:49 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: rQ alt.religion.scientology:548493 alt.clearing.technology:68708

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                            Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      Sthil Students
      Level VI Staff            HCO BULLETIN OF DECEMBER 8, 1964 
      R6 Graduates
                                         SCIENTOLOGY VI

                                    SOLO AUDITING AND R6 EW

                                         SOLO AUDITING



           The action of "solo auditing" is not self-auditing.

           Solo auditing is done in a regular session in Model Session
form.

           One of the few ways to get messed up in solo auditing is to
not use regular ses-
      sion form, to not keep a regular auditors report and to coffee
shop oneself.

           When the session begins, run it, when it ends, end it.  If
after a session you
      find yourself maundering around and self-auditing, you just have
something wrong in
      what you did or found in the last session.

           Inabilities to continue a solo audit series of sessions stem
wholly from end
      words getting into restimulation that dictate one way or another
not going on - how
      hopeless or impossible it is, etc.

           By-passed charge is not enough to stop a series of solo-audit
sessions.  Only
      end words can do it.

          Getting ARC Broken in solo audit is not unusual.  It is
handled just as you
      would handle an ARC Broken pc - by-passed charge assessment from a
list.


                                       PRE-REQUISITES

           It is presupposed that a Scientologist engaged in Solo Audit
is at least
      Provisional Class Vl.

           Lower levels simply can't solo audit.

           What makes solo auditing possible is the fact that on
processes below R6 one has
      communication as a necessity for auditing success.  But as this
necessity is part of
      the GPMs, when one is into R6 he or she is above this necessity. 
Only R6 can work
      without comm.  Therefore Solo Auditing is exclusively an R6
activity.

      One supposes the auditor solo auditing has already become:

      Level 0.    Willing to talk freely to people.

      Leve1 l.    Able to answer an auditing question.
      Level l.    Able to duplicate.

      level II.   Free of hidden standards, overts and PTPs.

      Level III.  Physically competant.

      Level IV.   Has been clear.

           If an auditor has not passed those six vital stages of a
case, solo auditing,
      to be blunt, is quite impossible.  The self discipline won't be
there; the needful
      insight into one's own motives will be lacking.  Any advanced
Scientologist always
      knows when he is dramatizing even when he is.  The being that
can't solo audit
      never believes he or she is dramatizing no matter what they are
doing or saying.

           Self control is a must in solo audit.  The pc who still needs
an auditor to
      progress should never be permitted to solo audit.

           Any pc, to go on R6 must go up through the six stages listed
above under
      levels.  If you don't take a pc through those first, that pc will
eventually fall
      on his or her head on R6.

           This is all the more true on solo auditing.

           If an auditor or pc is started on R6 prematurely there is the
remedy of doing
      the Life and Livingness version or the L6 list. Each question is
cleaned of needle
      reads by auditing by list.  Also the pc can be run on any remedy
or routine that does
      not assess for and use words as the key reason for recovery.  This
only outlaws
      Level IV and processes depending on assessment by meter for a word
to run.  Even
      Service Facs can be run on an R6 "failed case" and certainly O/W
can be run.  Clay
      Table Healing is very good on such a case.

           So if a Scientologist hasn't gone over the various hurdles as
above listed he
      or she should neither solo-audit at all or be run on R6.


                                    REASONS FOR SOLO AUDIT

           The basic reasons for solo auditing are:

           1.  No auditor can possibly run R6 successfully on another
without personally
      experiencing the simultaneous reads and case reactions.  It's all
just unreal to a
      person who hasn't seen the needle move and felt the bank shift at
the same instant.

      An auditor without this reality just messes up pcs.  There's no
qualifying or modify-
      ing that fact.  It's just true.  So an auditor who hasn't solo
audited on R6 just
      can't run it well or at all on a pc.  Such an auditor goofs.  And
a goof on R6 is
      horrible to a pc and has dreadful reactions.

           2.  Auditing a pc when one's own bank is in full cry on the
very same material
      is not conducive to good auditing.  This is overcame somewhat by
using a "paten"
      (a card with holes in it that is put on another paper and has in
it the line plot
      mostly written out) but not entirely.  When one begins R6 he or
she can be tao
      restimulated.  All banks are the same.

               The combined factor of no-reality on the bank and
restimulation as an
      auditor combine with the third.

           3.  An auditor just starting to use All-Style Auditing is
using a new tool and
      must have it perfect before he uses it.  This is like not swimming
until one knows
      how.  The best place to learn all-style is in solo-audit.

               You see, in solo auditing one can stop before he plows
in.  If one were
      auditing a pc, and erred, one would go on just that extra second
that means disaster.

      From which we get:

           4.  In solo auditing one is not assisted by the comm cycle to
go deeper than
      one can cope with.  R6 goes straight past the usual protective
mechanisms of the
      mind mentioned in Dianetics.  Therefore when one is auditing a pc
on R6 one can
      violate those mechanisms and get the pc in too deep.  While
solo-auditing one is
      still self-protected to a large degree.  One blunders, becomes
relatively incapable
      of going on, therefore doesn't keep plowing in.  The exception is
the foolish one
      who sees no read and goes on down several non-reading items. 
Suddenly down comes
      the roof, even so.  Thus solo auditing restores the
self-protective nature of the
      mind which R6 done by an auditor on a pc could violate by going
beyond where one
      should stop and investigate what's wrong.

           Thus solo auditing is:

           1.  Possible only on R6.

           2.  Possible only when a person has come up through the
levels.

           3.  Possible only when one is well trained.

           When one tries solo on lower levels, it doesn't work for long
- but we can't
      deny it does work somewhat even at lower levels sometimes.

           When one gets onto R6 solo before coming up through the
levels it's a jolly
      mess because one is having to do lower level auditing a lot of the
time (PTPs and
      overts for instance) that only an auditor cauld handle on a pc.

           When one isn't trained, up to R6, one can't handle it at all.

           So it's a specialized activity, solo auditing, and only for
the provisional
      Class VI.


                                    THE EARLIEST PROCESSES

           A student, just given his provisional classification, should
not be given any
      plots of any kind.

           His or her first 20 hours of solo audit should consist only
of locating
      dichotomies of end words.

           Dichotomy in the dictionary means "Division into two parts." 
It's a word we
      borrowed and gave a new meaning to.  And after all these years it
is very apt as
      you will discover.


                                           DICHOTOMIES

           The dichotomy in Scientologese means plus and minus.  A plus
word and a minus
      word.  They are of the same order of things always.  A crude
example would be "An
      Apple" and "Applelessness."  That's a pair, a dichotomy.

           The alchemist was on the fringe of this with his
active-passive farms and words.
      But he, looking for the gold of truth (only the latter ones looked
for real gold,
      having missed too many definitions, no doubt), didn't really look
for PLUS and MINUS.
      He looked for the active, such as Man, and the passive, such as
Woman by his defini
      tions.

           We, in a scientific age, look for the two sides of a thing,
taking our cue from
      electricity.  Plus and minus interchange a current as you will
find on any bat.wry.
      So we don't want active-passive.  We want the bold PLUS and MINUS,
the Opposites.

           Janus, the Roman God of gates and doors, had two faces.  So
does each major
      idea have two faces.  The nature of things is a major idea.  It
has two faces.

      PLUS and a MINUS.  These are opposed to each other.  They
interchange current.  They
      conflict.  Bad and good.  Things have a nature.  The nature can be
bad or it can be
      good.  Poison Ivy has a bad nature viewed from a body viewpoint. 
Cool water is
      good.  Thus the nature of things has two faces, two parts.

           There could be, let us say the major thought, "how one
feels."  This has two
      parts:  Elation and depression.  Elation is plus, depression is
minus.

           What is generally agreed to bc the unwanted or the poor side
is minus.  What is
      generally conceived to be all right is plus.

           In a modern society wc would have the major idea that an
individual has an
      economic status.  Wealth is the PLUS and Poverty is the MINUS.

           Now you don't have to have the major thought to get its two
parts to find a
      dichotomy.  But the two parts must add up to being comparable. 
You don't have Tall
      and Small as a dichotomy.  The major thought of which ''tall" is a
part is "height."
      Therefore you would have Tall and Short as the dichotomy.  Small
would be half of
      another major idea of "size."  Therefore you would have its "other
face" as Big or
      Large.

           You would not have Nagging and Violent as two parts.  They're
both on the same 
      side - both minus.  For nagging you might have praising.  And for
violent you might
      have benign.

           So a dichotomy means the two parts of a major idea.



                              THE CHARACTER OF THE REACTIVE MIND  

           Knowing the above you must also be informed of this:

           In the reactive mind the end words alternate between a plus
and a minus.  in
      the top half of the bank (reactive mind) the minus turns up and
has as the next one
      down its plus.  In the bottom half of the bank the Plus turns up
and just below it
      is the minus.

           Each is the end word of a series of GPMs.  Each GPM has a
line plot.

           The most charge (force, strength, electric energy) you can
find easily with
      the least disturbance if you err is a dichotomy of end words, a
pair.

           They are called end words because they come on the end of
each of a series of
      goals.

           Each end word has many root words.  These root words are the
regard or action
      one is supposed to have for the end word.  Grab _______would be a
root. It's the
      verb.

           Just ahead of the verb is the participle To which gives us
the implied purpose.

           To Grab _____ as a form would be, then, the complete "Root."
("Root" is just
      our word for this To Verb _____.)

           Add the End Word and you have a purpose, a goal.  End words
are always nouns
      or a condition made into a noun.  Avarice might be an end word -
Book or Books might
      be one.

           Thus we have To Grab Books as a full goal.  Or To Shun
Avarice would be one.
      But Books would have a lot more roots before we had done with
them.  So would Avarice.

           Each full goal, like To Grab Books, would have a Line Plot
with items like
      "Grabbing Books," or just "Grabbed Books."

           Now you see then that Root words are heavily repeated.  But
if you try to find
      them you may jam up many end words, for the same roots apply to
each pair of end
      words.

           The same applies to items in the Line plot.

           Therefore the one thing that can be plucked out of the
reactive mind without
      messing things up is a pair of end words.  They discharge to some
degree and as
      they're not repeated except in their own series, they don't
restimulate too much.

           Obviously then, in theory, End words would be the least
restimulative thing
      to find.

           In actual practice, they indeed are.  And not ony that, once
found they cool
      off one's dramatization of them quite wonderfully.  It's like
recalling a lost
      experience - just knowing it happened brings a big lift.  One
doesn't have to
      erase it all to have a lot less effect from it.

           So, in actual practice, then, the finding of end words brings
the most R6
      early case gain.

           Further, finding these pairs cool off the bank without
messing it up.  Badly
      found end words do very little to one.  Running a GPM badly can be
quite deadly.


                                           STARTING R6

           Therefore in starting R6, the solo auditor, regardless of the
availability or
      the Line Plot, Root Plot and End Word (or Series) Plot, should
find his or her
      own pairs of end words.

           This will tend to straighten out the Reactive Mind, unburden
it and cool off
      the whole case.  Same fantastic changes can result from this
action, if it is done
      right.

           When a lot of end words have been cooled off (had some charge
removed just by
      proving them out on a meter) one is enormously more capable.

           Two pairs of end words properly found is equal to about one
clear in terms of
      case gain.

           But the end words to be found must be the ones in
restimulation on the particu-
      lar case.  Just getting a standard list of end words to read does
very little except
      maybe upset one.


                                        PROCESS R6 EW

           The first process of solo auditing then is named R6 EW.  This
of course is
      both a co-audit and solo audit process, not only a solo process.

           This is very tricky as a process and the following rigid
rules must be closely
      followed.

                                        RULES OF R6 EW

           1.  No Listing with paper and pencil is permitted.  This
means no written lists
      of "possible end words."  Why not?  Because if you go by one in
listing, it suppresses
      and raises the mischief.  Also past auditors have loved 87 page
lists.  You should be
      able to get the right end word in about four or five words and you
sure don't need
      to write them as a list.  Write down the first idea of it only.

           2.  Write down every end word found and proven on a separate
card with its
      opposite also noted.  Each end word has a card with the end word
at the top boldly
      written with all its check out data.  Over on the left in small
letters is written
      the other one.  These two cards make one pair which thereby refer
to each other.

           3.  Never go on to a new pair before finding both end words
in the old pair.
      Don't find a plus, skip finding its minus and go on with another
plus.  Always
      find both before going on.

           4.  Don't try to plot them an the track or bank.  Just find
the pairs.

           5.  If anything goes wrong (meter hangs up, TA goes high, you
feel bad, you
      dramatize, you want to cease auditing forever, etc.) realize
you've got a wrong
      pair or a wrong mate somewhere behind you and find the right pair
or the right
      mate (the other end word or the pair).  Hence, keep your cards
consecutive and in
      one packet, the last end word found on top and its "other word"
the next one down.

           6.  Don't wander off onto some other action.  Such as
prepchecking an end word
      (my God!).  Getting curious about its roots or some GPM "To Shun
Cats."  Just keep
      after things like cats.  Realize if you stray, you've found a
wrong pair or mis-
      matched an end word behind you.  Look for it.

           7.  Realize that the read of the needle transfers easily to
locks if you
      suppress or challenge an end word too hard.  But, saving grace,
the one that reads
      heavily on "suppress" or "challenge" (Have I challenged Cats?) is
it.  A suppress
      or challenge read on a particular end word serves to prove it.

           8.  Note all meter and TA actions on the card.

           9.  Don't write a list between sessions.  You may jot one
down if it leaps up
      but in the next session you must take it up at once.  Jotting down
fifty between
      sessions you haven't proved up will literally slaughter you.  If
you do jot down
      fifty, take up the first one and go down the whole list, proving
out the opposite
      of each you prove.

           10.  Find only pairs.  If you prove out a PLUS then find its
Minus.  If you
      prove out a MINUS find its Plus.

           Those are the rules of R6 EW.  They are far more important
than how you do the
      process.


                                         THE PROCESS

           This is a game like charades.  (Charades:  a party game of
guessing a word or
      phrase from someone acting out its parts.)  Only it's played with
this question:

           "What am I dramatizing?"  (Or "What word might you be
dramatizing?" for a pc.)

           That's the question.

           Not, as in charades, what is he or she trying to get across? 
But what noun is
      being dramatized?  Not what goal (Janus forbid!) but what single,
nounal word.  Not
      what pair; that would really chew one up.  Just, what noun?

           You write down this first idea rather lengthily on your
auditor's report.  Then
      you use that to find a single noun, singular or plural, that sums
it up.  You work
      with that written sentence until you've got it.  Then you find its
opposite.

           Remember, there's a lot of "ities" and "ice" like
"Servilities" and "Avarice"
      whereby what we consider as adjectives usually get made into
nouns.  But also nouns
      as nouns.

           Not automobiles, of course.  Thetans at the start of the
universe didn't have
      them.  But Machinery might do.  Not clowns.  Too specific.  But
"Assininities" might
      work.

           The whole question is just "What did I, a thetan, early track
cook up that I
      am now getting my head kicked in with?" "Tallness," "Stealth,"
"Hugeness,"
      "Vastnesses," that sort of thing.

           One checks out the correct word to express it with usual
patter.  "Is this an
      end word?"  "Does it have GPMs?"  "Is it a lock?"  "is it an
implant?"  "Is it an
      actual end word?"  "Is it a phrase out of an engram?"  "Is it a
lock on a root?"
      "Is it an Item?"  There's no staccato patter that fits except "Is
it an end word?"
      which is asked every time along with other questions.

           You worry at it until you know by needle action and TA
blowdown it is an end
      word or you know it isn't.  When it definitely isn't it's very
wise to find the
      right wording that is the end word.  Don't just give up the
notion.

           When you've got a real end word and hauled it in and written
it down and why
      you know it is by meter behaviour, you then must find its mate.

           Snakes travel in pairs.  So do end words.  Both sides of the
same sort of
      thing.  If you just found "Rotten" you must now find "Fresh" or
"Preserved" and
      prove that out on its card.

           Here's an example:  You ask "What am I dramatizing?"  You
think, then "Eating."
      Ok, what is its reaction?  Well ing isn't any end word so maybe
its "Food."  That
      doesn't read.  Maybe it's "Inflow.''  And so on and suddenly bang,
full dial, there
      It is, gills flippers and all, the right one that expresses that
idea you had.

           Good.  Now let's get the opposite.  "Hunger," "Deprivation,"
etc., etc.  And
      bang, you have its partner, the second fish.

           And so you go.

           Pretty soon they start popping up.  Check them out, get the
pair, pair after
      pair.  When it all slows down again, once more "What am I
dramatizing7"  And you're
      on your way once more.

           It's quite a process.

           Be thorough, be accurate, and you'll make some long, long
strides toward O.T.

           And in solo audit, learn how to handle All Style to the
degree of checking out.
      And learn bank reactions subjectively and as an auditor.

           Only when you've a nice big pile of cards should you be
thinking of running
      GPMs Item by Item off a Line Plot.

           Remember, even if you had the full end word plot, you'd make
faster personal
      gains at first and faster gains as an auditor using R6 EW.

           It is my convinced opinion that if an auditor can't solo
audit with high gain
      what is now called R6 EW he or she should not be let near running
GPMs, much less
      audit another preclear.

           R6 EW has been actually a research tool.  When I found how to
convert it to a
      process it already had its rules laid out and proven in research.

           It has not been used at this writing for case gain only by
others.  I can,
      therefore, predict several HCO Bulletins giving must-nots and all
that.

           However, the facts remain:

           1.  It takes an ability to detect one's own actions before
one can detect those
      of others;

           2.  It takes unburdening to make a case run smoothly;

           3.  The least dangerous early approach to O.T. with the
greatest case gains
      lies in the discovery of pairs of end words that are in
restimulation on one's
      own case;

           4.  The best way to start a new pc (who must have been
through the six phases
      listed above before R6 plus pc training) is to use R6 EW on him. 
Not run GPMs.

           The question, "What am I dramatizing?" may be unflattering
and you may prefer
      "What noun has been in restimulation."  If so, fine.  All the
same.

      LRH:jw                                          L. RON HUBBARD
      Copyright (c) 1964
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





      HCOB 04JAN65 - R6 CORRECTION

                                 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                           Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      Sthil Students           HCO BULLETIN OF JANUARY 4, 1965
      Level VI Staff
      R6 Graduates                      SCIENTOLOGY VI


                                    R6 EW, R6 EWS, R6 EWP

                                            R6 EW

                                          CORRECTION



           By listing a very few end words beyond the one the pc thinks
it was, the actual
      one is unburdened enough so that it will now read if you go back
to it. 

           Sometimes the first one or the second one was the end word
but is too over-
      burdened to read.

           If one goes on without going back to check it then if it was
the one it will
      suppress and things will get uncomfortable.

           The specific correction to R6 EW is that one does record
carefully each one
      thought of and checked over.  If none have read in a list of a
dozen or so end words
      at the very most (usually 6 or 8), go back and check the list
again for suppressions
      and challenges.  Often no suppress or challenge need be
mentioned.  The correct
      word, unburdened by the additional listing, will just read when
mentioned.

           Major discomfort can be encountered by checking a real end
word out, then
      deciding it wasn't it and going on without going back to it.  Thus
one does need a
      record.

                                            R6 EWS

           When R6 EW seems a bit flat, R6 EWS can be entered into.
      This is done like R6 EW but six are found, not a pair.

           It will be found that the major dichotomy is the middle pair
with a similar
      pair of end words on either side.

           No effort is made to arrange them in relation to each other,
or the other GPMs.

           One just finds the six.  Hence R6 EWS (Routine 6 End Word
Sixes).

           To do this, take the first pair found in R6 EW and locate the
additional two
      pairs.  Then take the next R6 EW pair and locate the two
additional pair.

           All the rules of R6 EW apply.


                                            R6 EWP

           When R6 EWS is reasonably flat, begin R6 EWP.

           This means "Routine 6, End Word Plot."

           To do this, first get the six you first found in R6 EWS and
get them into proper
      relation to each other.  Then take this first six found as now
lined up and relate
      it to the second six.  Then correctly line up the second six
within itself.

           Sixes are related to each other by the auditor by numbering,
by finding if
      there "are a lot of GPMs between," "which six is prior to the
other," etc.

           In short, one does whatever is necessary to arrange all sizes
in relation to
      one another.

           Of course, new sixes show up.  Do R6 EWS on this and relate
them to the remain-
      ing sixes.

           This is best done with a card file.

           Of course all GPM end words are written on a separate card
like this:

          
______________________________________________________________
          |                                                            
|
          |                                     4 Jan. '65             
|
          |                                                            
|
          |                     Steam F                                
|
          |                     End word LF                            
|
          |                     Correct F                              
|
          |  Ice                Suppress LFBD                          
|
          |                                                            
|
          |                                                            
| 
          |                                                            
|
         
|_____________________________________________________________|


           Then one has one for the opposite:

          ______________________________________________________________
          |                                                            
|
          |                                     4 Jan. '65             
|
          |                                                            
|
          |                     Ice F                                  
|
          |                     End word LFBD                          
|
          |                     Correct LF                             
|
          |                     Challenged LF                          
|
          |                                                            
|
          |  Steam                                                     
| 
          |                                                            
|
         
|_____________________________________________________________|


           This way, when correcting any six in sequence you have a card
for each and
      only change the opposite words about like this:

           _____________________________________________________________
          |                                                            
|
          |                                     10 Jan. '65            
|
          |                                                            
|
          |                     Races F                                
|
          |                     End word LFBD                          
|
          |                     Correct F                              
|
          |                                                            
|
          |  Walks lock                                                
|
          |  Pokes - corrected opposite to F                           
| 
          |                                                            
|
         
|_____________________________________________________________|


           R6 EWP has two plotting steps.

                1.  Plot the six in relation to each other, most prior
to, nearest top.
                2.  Plot the six in relation to the other sixes.

           GPMs will respond to numbering from the top as #1 right on
back.  "Is this GPM
      greater than 50?  Less than 50 from the top?  Greater than 40,
less than 40?  Is it
      41, 42, 43 -- Is it 43?  Plots as 43rd GPM from the top."

           Sixes respond to "prior" and "nearer the top."  "Is this six
prior to the cough
      six?  Is it closer to the top?  The cough six is prior."


                                           SUMMARY

           This is all rather easy to do.

           The main point is that R6 EW, R6 EWS and R6 EWP must all be
pretty flat and the
      end word plot correct before you even try to run Items and GPMs.

           Don't do R6 EW, then get eager and start to run GPMs Item by
Item.  Flatten
      R6 EW, then go on to R6 EWS.  Then go to R6 EWP.  Then start on
items.

           You'll have it much easier.  The only real way to get slowed
down is to try to
      run items before the bank is thoroughly unburdened with R6EW, R6
EWS and R6 EWP.

           Three months of heavy auditing would run out the whole bank
anyway.  Why rush?
      If you try to rush it, it'll take a year or two.  You've been
aberrated this long,
      a few months can be tolerated - and for that matter, a year or two
on the lower
      levels also.  The only way to not make it is not to do all of
Level 0, Level 1,
      Level II, Level III, Level IV and all of R6 as above.

      LRH:jw                                             L. RON HUBBARD
      Copyright (c) 1965
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





      HCOB 24JAN65 - R6-EW LARGE READS

                                HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                            Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      Sthill Students          HCO BULLETIN OF JANUARY 24, 1965
      R6 Coaudit
                                        SCIENTOLOGY VI

                                            R6 - EW

                           (Replaces HCO Bulletin of January 16, 1965)

                                           LARGE READS


           A primary reason a student does not get large reads on the
meter is that he or
      she is not looking for the right group for his or her case.

           Large reads are a must.  Only large reads count.

           Tone Arm action is an unreliable indicator as solo audit
tends to neglect TA
      adjustment.

           Consistent and continual large reads (1/3 of a dial or more
at sensitivity 5)
      is the expected meter behavior, with occasional .2 Blowdowns.  If
this is not hap-
      pening, then the student is looking for a wrong group for his
case, or has suppres-
      sed and invalidated end words, or has wrongly matched some up, or
has found some
      wrong ones.

           If one isn't getting large reads, one must not go on to new
fields.  One must
      overhaul what one has already done.


                                        QUITTING ON R6

           Tendency to quit or blow doing the R6s always stems from (a)
past R6 errors;
      (b) dramatization of a missed end word; (c) failure to locate an
end word one is
      dramatizing; or (d) failure to get large reads.

           Mismatch of pairs, wrong Form of end words are the most
serious errors and
      will lock up the meter.

           One must a1so remember that the bank itself dictates a
cessation of action.

           A case in point is an end word "Impossibleness," resulting
when not found
      but restimulated, in a cessation of solo audit.

           The point is that one doesn't quit for P.T. reasons, no
matter how good they
      sound.  One quits or slows down or blows solely because of end
words or GPMs.

           "It's always an end word" is an excellent maxim for patching
up any upset.

           By the way, this is true also at lower levels but in this
case one hasn't a
      prayer of getting at the end word and if one did try then the
resulting mess would
      be too hard to repair 80% of the time.  One lucky break in
locating the end word
      on a lower level pc can ruin an auditor.  Afterwards, he keeps
trying and flunking.
      For you have to have a pc in comm and a bank unburdened to run R6
successfully.

      If older schools of practitioners ever contact this portion of our
data, I can
      predict with confidence that they will fail miserably in all
efforts to apply it -
      for they have not begun to walk the bridge in the right place.  To
succeed with
      R6 data they would have to embrace the whole of Scientology and
its ethics as
      well and they wouldn't be older practitioners then, would they. 
Scientology is
      all of a piece.  An auditor has to know his lower levels.  And a
preclear must
      walk the bridge from where he can have a reality on it.


                                        END WORD FORMS

           There are two sources for end words in each GPM:

           1.  The end word of the one oppterm; and

           2.  The end word of the goal and other items.

           The one oppterm, as per the line plot, has the end word as a
forthright noun.
      In that oppterm, "boy" (if it were an end word, which it isn't)
would be BOY.

           In the goal as an RI and the goal as an oppterm, it would be
BOYNESS or
      BOYIOUSNESS or BOYINGNESS.

           The suffix NESS is the clue here.  It seems to occur
uniformly in the goal as
      an RI and the goal as an oppterm.

           Therefore you can get two apparent forms of end word.  One is
the forthright
      noun occurring in the normal opptermn.  The other is a
modification, adding -- NESS
      and sometimes -- FULLNESS or perhaps --INGNESS, --LINESS, or --
IOUSNESS.

           The idea is very plain.

           Just knocking out a boy would be a small action.  But
knocking out things
      which knock out boys would be a much broader action,

           Therefore GPMs in their goal items have an end word ending in
the NESS form
      of the noun.

                                     PURPOSE OF THE BANK

           The probable purpose of the bank is to suppress all creating
and destroying
      by aiming creation at evil and destruction at good.  This
apparently was to
      restrain all creation and destruction and so gives us the Mest
Universe.


      LRH:jw                                               L. RON
HUBBARD 
      Copyright (c) 1965
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





      HCOB 13MAY65 - LIST 6 EW

                                HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                           Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      Gen Non Remimeo            HCO BULLETIN OF 13 MAY 1965
      Saint Hill Studs
      R6 Grads                            LIST 6 EW

                                 (Reworked by Roger Biddell)



           The following is a By-Passed Charge Assessment list For R6EW
for use in locat-
      ing by-passed charge when auditing R6EW and R6EWS.


                               ARC BREAK ASSESSMENT - LIST L6EW

           Prefix each question on this list with ...."IN LIFE....", or
"IN THIS
      SESSION....", or, "IN THAT SESSION....", or, "SINCE (date or other
      indication of period being covered)....", as appropriate.

           1.   Has an End Word been dramatised?
           2.   Has an unfound End Word been dramatised?
           3.   Has a missed End Word been dramatised?
           4.   Has a wrong End Word been dramatised?
           5.   Has the wrong dramatisation been selected?
           6.   Has a dramatisation been by-passed?
           7.   Has a dramatisation been misassigned?
           8.   Has a dramatisation been not-ised?
           9.   Has a dramatisation been left undischarged?
           10.  Has a dramatisation been left unflat?
           11.  Has a dramatisation been over-run?
           12.  Has a Root Word been dramatised?
           13.  Has a Root Word been restimulated?
           14.  Has an End Word been restimulated?
           15.  Has more than one End Word been restimulated?
           16.  Has an End Word been missed?
           17.  Has an End Word been not-ised?
           18.  Has an End Word been suppressed?
           19.  Has an End Word been challenged?
           20.  Has an End Word been refused?
           21.  Has an End Word been abandoned?
           22.  Has an End Word been flinched from?
           23.  Has an End Word been by-passed?
           24.  Has a wrong End Word been chosen?
           25.  Has a wrong End Word been accepted?
           26.  Has the wrong Form of an End Word been accepted?
           27.  Has an End Word been wrongly worded?
           28.  Has the meter challenged an End Word?
           29.  Has the meter not-ised an End Word?
           30.  Has the Dictionary challenged an End Word?
           31.  Has the Dictionary not-ised an End Word?
           32.  Has an End Word been previously Found?
           33.  Has an End Word been left unpaired?
           34.  Has an End Word been previously paired?
           35.  Has an End Word been mismatched?
           36.  Has a correct pair been made incorrect?
           37.  Has an incorrect pair been insisted upon?
           38.  Have similar End Words been put opposite one another?
           39.  Have opposite End Words been considered to be similar to
one another?
           40.  Has a GPM been restimulated?
           41.  Has a lock been restimulated?
           42.  Has an implant been restimulated?
           43.  Has an engram been restimulated?
           44.  Have previous errors in auditing End Words been
restimulated?
           45.  Has a mass been left unnamed?
           46.  Has a word been misunderstood?
           47.  Has a word been misdefined?
           48.  Has a pattern been rejected?
           49.  Has a cognition been rejected?
           50.  Has a cognition been overlooked?
           51.  Has what was okay, been not-ised?
           52.  Has a miss of any kind occurred?
           53.  Has a process been interfered with?
           54.  Has some by-passed charge been incompletely located?
           55.  Has some other kind of charge been by-passed?
           56.  Has an ARC break been audited over?
           57.  Has no auditing occurred?
           58.  Has a flinch of any kind occurred?
           59.  Have gains been challenged?  
           60.  Has R6 been challenged?

      Final questions asked without a prefix....

           61.  Has the charge been missed on this list?
           62.  Is it not by-passed charge?
           63.  Is it a session ARC break?

      LRH:mh                                          L. RON HUBBARD
      Copyright (c) 1965
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





      HCOB 22SEP68 - REHAB OF VA

                      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

                    HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTETMBER 1968

      Non-Remimeo
      Class VII
      Class VIII
      Confidential
                               REHAB OF VA


                In rehab of VA you null to one item, be sure ruds
      are in before rehab.

                When you correct VA you null the list and follow
      the laws of listing.  Do the HCOB of 6/6/66 No. 2 on each
      item that is newly found.

                In principle re-running VA without the original
      list can be fatal.

                If anything thinks "Null to 1 Item" means you grind
      on the same list until all but one goes out he'd better wake
      up.  If two or three items are reading on a list, it is
      incomplete and must be extended.  If all begin to read, the
      item has been by-passed.

                VA lists sometimes have to be extended.


                                                R. RON HUBBARD
                                                   Founder
      LRH:jp:pm
      Copyright (c) 1968
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
